Close Menu
    What's Hot

    UGREEN Unveils Nexode & MagFlow Air Editions: Super Compact Power to Go

    August 3, 2026

    Tencent Cloud and tapmad Partner to Deliver Seamless Streaming for a Global Football Tournament in Pakistan

    August 3, 2026

    Goldwind-powered Ummbila Emoyeni Wind Farm Phase One Enters Commercial Operation, Marking a Milestone in South Africa’s Just Energy Transition

    August 2, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Giza DailyGiza Daily
    • Automotive
    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Luxury
    • News
    • Sports
    • Technology
    • Travel
    Giza DailyGiza Daily
    Home » Inflation and jobs data leave Fed on cautious path
    Featured News

    Inflation and jobs data leave Fed on cautious path

    July 11, 2025
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email VKontakte Telegram WhatsApp

    Minutes from the United States Federal Reserve’s June 17-18 policy meeting reveal growing divergence among officials over the direction and pace of interest rate cuts, as policymakers grapple with the impact of new trade tariffs, inflation dynamics, and a shifting labor market. Despite these differences, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) unanimously voted to keep the benchmark federal funds rate steady at 4.25% to 4.50% for the fourth consecutive meeting.

    While most officials indicated that rate reductions later this year are likely appropriate, opinions varied significantly on the scale and timing. Some participants viewed the inflationary effects of recent tariffs as temporary, arguing that they would not disrupt long-term inflation expectations. Others warned that persistent price pressures, if left unchecked, could complicate the U.S. Fed’s dual mandate of price stability and full employment.

    Inflation, tariffs, and employment data weigh on rate outlook

    The minutes noted that “most participants assessed that some reduction in the target range would likely be appropriate” given signs that economic momentum may be weakening. Officials cited softening labor market indicators and declining consumer spending as potential reasons to ease policy, while acknowledging that inflation remained above the Fed’s 2% target. Fed governors Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman, both publicly supportive of imminent rate cuts, have suggested that reductions could begin as early as the July 29-30 meeting, contingent on continued inflation moderation.

    However, other officials expressed caution, emphasizing that the federal funds rate may already be near a neutral level, warranting only limited adjustments going forward. Internal projections from the June meeting suggest the central bank anticipates two rate cuts in 2025, followed by three additional reductions over the following two years. Nevertheless, the so-called “dot plot” a graphical representation of individual policymakers’ outlooks revealed a wide range of views, underscoring the uncertainty surrounding the economic trajectory.

    Powell maintains cautious stance amid political pressure

    The discussion comes amid escalating pressure from President Donald Trump, who has publicly criticized Fed Chair Jerome Powell and urged more aggressive rate cuts. Trump has tied monetary policy to his broader trade agenda, including the imposition of new tariffs, which some economists fear could rekindle inflation. Despite these critiques, Powell has reiterated the Fed’s commitment to data-driven decision-making and independence from political influence.

    While recent data show headline U.S. inflation rising just 0.1% in May, underlying measures remain above the Fed’s comfort zone. Employment figures remain resilient, with June non-farm payrolls exceeding expectations and the unemployment rate falling to 4.1%. However, consumer spending has slowed, with retail sales down 0.9% in May. Federal Reserve officials emphasized the need to remain flexible in the months ahead, noting they may face difficult trade-offs if inflation persists while employment deteriorates. – By Content Syndication Services.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email VKontakte WhatsApp
    Previous ArticleTrump’s copper tariff plan pushes U.S. prices to record highs
    Next Article Over 2100 senior NASA staff set to exit agency workforce

    Related Posts

    Dun & Bradstreet SAME Brings Dun & Bradstreet, Anthropic Collaboration to Local Markets, Transforming AI-Driven Compliance Through Claude

    July 22, 2026

    Risk-On or Risk-Off? How to Read Global Sentiment Before You Trade

    July 20, 2026

    Fynd Launches ‘Fynd Create’ in GCC, an AI-Native Platform for Fashion Design, Sourcing and Production

    July 15, 2026
    Editor's Pick

    Canadian economy grew 0.3% in May report

    August 1, 2026

    Australia reforms National Disability Insurance Scheme rules

    August 1, 2026

    India commits 84084 crore rupees to offshore energy security

    August 1, 2026

    Apple market cap reaches 4.94 trillion to top Nvidia

    July 29, 2026

    Gold prices fall on strong dollar ahead of central bank meeting

    July 29, 2026

    Porsche to cut 5000 more jobs under restructuring plan

    July 28, 2026

    Senate crypto bill faces pushback over conflict of interest rules

    July 28, 2026
    © 2026 Giza Daily | All Rights Reserved
    • Home
    • Contact Us

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.